Edward Norton had no choice when it came to starring in the Italian job

Whether you buy into Norton’s theory or consider him just another spoiled Hollywood star, the actor’s story suggests he sees himself as more than just another on-screen face. He’s not the kind of actor who shows up, stands up, says his lines and leaves the rest to others. Whenever he is dissatisfied with the work of others, he does not hesitate to step on toes to make the film he believes should be made.

In 2002, The LA Times asked Norton about his tendency to butt heads with directors, and the actor ignored him as part of the creative process. “I think conflict is a very essential thing,” he explained. “If everyone’s reasons for hustling have to do with a group desire to make things as good as possible, that’s a good thing! And I think a lot of very happy productions have produced a lot of very happy movies. banal.”

Although productions initially tolerated Norton’s control-maniacal tendencies to capitalize on his acting talent, Norton’s reputation finally caught up with him in 2008 when he fought for artistic control of “The Incredible Hulk. from Marvel, which led to her being replaced by Mark Ruffalo in the incredibly successful. “The Avengers.” At the time, /Film founder Peter Sciretta detailed Norton’s preferences for the final cut and predicted Norton’s separation from the franchise. Despite all the controversy, some argue that Norton’s Hulk is better than Ruffalo’s and lament his split from the franchise.

The story suggests that Edward Norton thrives on antagonistic filmmakers, and much to the chagrin of studios and directors, a lack of friction seems to result in a happy production, but produces a lackluster performance from the award-winning actor.

Comments are closed.